Skip to main content
← Oracle Tier Evidence

Lido Wrapper (wstETH / ETH)

Oracle deep-dive for 0x4f67e4d9bd67efa28236013288737d39aef48e79 — Lido wstETH wrapper + Chainlink.

  • Source: Lido Wrapper + Chainlink
  • Pair: wstETH / ETH
  • Score: 0.6
  • Tier: Medium Risk (Elevated)
  • Slug: lido_chainlink_eth_wsteth_eth

Contract Architecture

This is a composite oracle — a single Chainlink-compatible feed address that internally chains two conversions:

  1. wstETH -> stETH via Lido wrapper contract (stETH.getPooledEthByShares())
  2. stETH -> ETH via Chainlink stETH/ETH feed

The output is wstETH/ETH. The ETH -> USD conversion happens at the market level via a separate base_feed_two (Chainlink ETH/USD at 0x5f4ec3...).

Score Breakdown

ComponentScore ImpactRationale
Base: stETH/ETH Chainlink feed0.7Established Chainlink feed, but less mature than ETH/USD
Wrapper dependency-0.05Extra contract in the price path
Layered complexity-0.05Two-hop derivation, not a direct feed
Final0.6

Risk Dimensions

Derived oracle (2 dependency layers)

The wstETH price is not directly observed — it is computed through two contracts. Each layer adds a failure mode:

  • Wrapper failure: If the Lido contract's getPooledEthByShares() returns incorrect values (bug, upgrade, governance action), the wstETH/stETH rate breaks
  • Chainlink feed failure: If the stETH/ETH feed goes stale, deviates, or halts, the second hop fails

Both layers must function correctly for the final price to be accurate.

Liquidity / peg deviation risk

stETH can trade below its theoretical 1:1 peg with ETH during market stress. The Chainlink stETH/ETH feed would reflect this deviation, but the wrapper conversion (wstETH -> stETH) assumes the accounting rate, not the market rate. During a depeg event, the oracle path could produce a price that diverges from the actual market value of wstETH.

Historical context: 2022 stETH depeg

In June 2022, stETH depegged to ~0.93 ETH during the 3AC/Celsius crisis. A wstETH oracle using this two-hop path would have correctly captured the depeg through the Chainlink stETH/ETH feed, but the wrapper conversion (accounting-based) would have been unaffected. The divergence between the wrapper rate and market rate creates basis risk.

Why Not High Risk (0.4)

  • stETH is the most liquid LST with deep secondary markets (Curve, Uniswap, 1inch)
  • Chainlink stETH/ETH feed is mature with multiple node operators
  • Wrapper conversion (getPooledEthByShares) is deterministic and immutable in the current Lido contract
  • The two-hop path is well-understood and widely used in DeFi (Aave, Compound, Morpho all use it)

Why Not Reference-Grade (0.9+)

  • No single direct feed — relies on computation across two contracts
  • stETH peg is not guaranteed (proven by 2022 event)
  • Wrapper contract adds an intermediary that could theoretically be affected by Lido governance
  • Price is partially computed, not fully market-discovered